Case Study: Detecting the Tactics of a Well-Known Red Team Exercise

This case study involves a securities company, where CloudCoffer MatrixShield played a critical role in detecting and stopping a simulated red team attack.
The exercise began with an exploited file upload vulnerability and progressed toward establishing persistence and a command-and-control (C2) channel.

1. Initial Access – Exploiting File Upload Vulnerability of a Shadow API

The red team testers identified a file upload feature without sufficient security checks, leveraging a “shadow API” endpoint that was not documented or monitored.
They successfully uploaded a malicious ASP web shell. This file granted the attacker the ability to execute arbitrary code on the server.

2. Execution – Running Malicious VBScript via eval()

The uploaded ASP file contained malicious code centered on the eval() function, enabling dynamic execution of VBScript. Key techniques included:

  • Extended Execution Time:
    Server.ScriptTimeout = 3600 ensured the script would not time out.
  • Error Suppression:
    On Error Resume Next allowed code execution to continue without interruptions.
  • Custom Decoder:
    Function bd(byVal s) decoded the malicious payload.
  • Obfuscated Dynamic Execution:
    Using string assembly (Ex" & chr(101) & "cute(...)) to evade detection.
  • File System Manipulation:
    Decoded VBScript was capable of accessing and modifying server files.

These steps showed the attacker’s intent to execute server-side malicious operations. The following screenshot showed the content of the web shell.

3. Persistence – Preparing for Long-Term Access

The VBScript initially listed the drives on the server, a reconnaissance step to enable persistence.
From this point, the attacker could:

  • Plant Backdoors in hidden/system directories for future re-entry.
  • Create Scheduled Tasks to automatically run malicious scripts at set intervals.
  • Modify System Files so malicious code could execute during system startup.

Although listing drives seemed harmless, it was a critical pivot point toward maintaining control.

4. Potential Impact if C2 Was Established

Had the C2 channel been successfully set up, the attacker could:

  • Exfiltrate Sensitive Data – user credentials, financial records, business secrets.
  • Deface or Alter Website Content – inserting malicious links or false information.
  • Conduct Lateral Movement – using the compromised server to target internal systems.
  • Launch DoS Attacks – causing service disruption or downtime.

5. Defensive Actions and Results

CloudCoffer MatrixShield successfully detected and blocked the attack flow.
Key measures included:

  • Vulnerability Detection & Prevention – identifying the file upload flaw, blocking the attack, and providing raw data for further analysis.
  • WAF Rule Enhancement – adding signature keywords to detect and block similar attacks early.
  • Attack Replay Testing – using MatrixShield’s Replay feature to confirm that security measures could stop the exploit in real scenarios.

Takeaway for Organizations

Even a simple file upload feature can become the entry point for a full server compromise if not properly secured.
Security measures should include:

  • Inventorying APIs and identifying shadow APIs
  • File type/content validation
  • Restricting upload permissions
  • Malware scanning before storing files
  • WAF rules for suspicious patterns
  • Continuous monitoring & replay testing of defenses